Related Posts
More Posts
Additional Posts in Life Sciences Consulting
New to Fishbowl?
Download the Fishbowl app to
unlock all discussions on Fishbowl.
unlock all discussions on Fishbowl.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Download the Fishbowl app to unlock all discussions on Fishbowl.
Copy and paste embed code on your site
Send download link to your phone
OR
Scan your QR code to download
Fishbowl app on your mobile
CV has a 100% fee based comp structure. Starting at principal level it becomes much more competitive than almost any other firm out there (incl. 3-4 years MBB partners). This combined with the phenomenal growth the firm has, makes it a good place to get going - if you are able to sell work.
@McK1 wont debate the veracity of any of P1’s claims (fwiw ex MBB here as well) but you should keep in mind CV operates much more leanly than MBB - it’s effectively all consultants with minimal support staff, a steeper pyramid (there’s an extra 2-3 layers vs McK), a multistaffing model for their EMs, skew toward higher margin private sector strategy/research, and significant YoY growth for a rate card that’s (just guessing here) 30-50% cheaper (in the US only, no less). In that sense I wouldn’t be surprised a principal/MD/Partner at CV could match MBB comp for the high performers particularly with an eat what you kill model. Maybe not SPs but I could see P
https://joinfishbowl.com/post_uy4wdl
In short - no, it’s not B4 Director equivalent. Principal at CV would be equiv to M/SM/P, MD/Partner to P/SP at MBB